Skip to main content

Annotated Article Bibliography - Separating the Wheat From the Chaff

McEwen I. (2103). Separating the Wheat From the Chaff A Guide to Weeding. Teacher Librarian,
          volume 39 (4), 33-34.

      Teacher librarian Ian McEwen describes the two types of teacher weeders. His discussion of the the two types includes how they handle the arduous and often polarizing task that is weeding. McEwen also discusses the reasons we weed and gives tips for making the process easier.

Summary

    Ian McEwen is a teacher librarian in Canada. He describes that teacher librarians fall into two types of librarian: Type A weeders are confident and efficient. They don’t second guess their decisions and get rid of material that has run its course without remorse. Type B weeders agonize over their choices, worried that their choices are the wrong ones and often come up with a reason why an item should be saved. McEwen chronicles a conversation with a student whose school library book fell apart in his possession. Due to its age and disrepair, the student was not able to recover the pieces. While McEwen strove for reasons to keep the book on the shelf, the student in question cited that the book smelled like his family’s moldy basement and questioned why it was still in circulation. McEwen sent the boy back to class, but had much to consider.   

     McEwen cites looks, condition and relevance of the material in weeding. The first two are simple enough to spot. He explains the nuances of the material being relevant by advocating for judging a book by its cover.  Would today’s school age readers recognize the subject, fashions, or material on the cover? If not, then the books need weeding. He also cites the ‘what-if’ factor of weeding. The feeling of what-if that a lot of librarians face in the worry a book or series that circulated well once upon a time might do so again. McEwen advocates for pulling these books in favor of a new series that could circulate better or attract new readers.
   
     In a world where physical books have much to compete with, weeding keeps the collection up to date and becoming a Type A weeder allows for it to happen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Data Driven Deselection: Using a Decision Support Tool

Ehret Snyder, C. (2013, Dec 20). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39 , 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2013.866607 Weeding is a time-consuming and sensitive task for librarians. It is necessary to make space for new material, keep information current and updated, and remove items in poor condition. Librarians have to determine what kind of data is necessary to review in order to justify removing an item from the library’s shelves. Tools exist to help librarians gather multiple points of data to make the process more efficient. The librarians at Olin Library, part of Rollins College in Florida, utilized such a tool (Sustainable Collections Services) to help them update their collection and present the findings in this paper. Summary: Librarians are short on time and weeding is one of the most time-consuming tasks they can take on. Criteria is necessary to make...

Annotated Bibliography- Weeding E-Books

Waugh, M., Donlin, M., & Braunstein, S. (2015, Jan 14). Next-generation collection management: a case study of quality control and weeding e-books in an academic library. Collection Management, 40 (1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.965864 This paper presents a case study in e-book weeding from Louisiana State University. E-book collection management policies do not exist in over 95% of ARL (Association of Research Libraries) facilities and it is unlikely numbers would be much lower in any library. E-book collections need to be evaluated according to a thoughtfully created policy in order to keep an up to date, useful collection to serve patrons needs. By examining the difficulties and triumphs experienced by other libraries, staff can work to address deficiencies in their facilities.   A major problem will be interacting with vendors since they control collections. It will be important for individual libraries demand better self-service, s...

Annotated Bibliography - Weeding With ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic Library

O’Neill, J. L. (2016). Weeding with ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic          Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(2), 108-115. doi:10.31229/osf.io/hym8b California State University Fullerton has been open since 1957. Up until 2014, there had not been a large-scale weeding completed of the materials in Pollak Library. Instructional Design Librarian J. Lindsay O’Neill turned to the design process known as ADDIE to develop a method to train librarians to undergo the task. Summary           Weeding is often a difficult task to perform. Not only is it done less often than most tasks library staff perform, it often comes with the guilt of removing material, the fear of making the wrong call, and the concern from stakeholders about ‘throwing books away.’ Making the task even more difficult is the lack of formal training for librarians on weeding in the field....