Skip to main content

Annotated Article Bibliography - Separating the Wheat From the Chaff

McEwen I. (2103). Separating the Wheat From the Chaff A Guide to Weeding. Teacher Librarian,
          volume 39 (4), 33-34.

      Teacher librarian Ian McEwen describes the two types of teacher weeders. His discussion of the the two types includes how they handle the arduous and often polarizing task that is weeding. McEwen also discusses the reasons we weed and gives tips for making the process easier.

Summary

    Ian McEwen is a teacher librarian in Canada. He describes that teacher librarians fall into two types of librarian: Type A weeders are confident and efficient. They don’t second guess their decisions and get rid of material that has run its course without remorse. Type B weeders agonize over their choices, worried that their choices are the wrong ones and often come up with a reason why an item should be saved. McEwen chronicles a conversation with a student whose school library book fell apart in his possession. Due to its age and disrepair, the student was not able to recover the pieces. While McEwen strove for reasons to keep the book on the shelf, the student in question cited that the book smelled like his family’s moldy basement and questioned why it was still in circulation. McEwen sent the boy back to class, but had much to consider.   

     McEwen cites looks, condition and relevance of the material in weeding. The first two are simple enough to spot. He explains the nuances of the material being relevant by advocating for judging a book by its cover.  Would today’s school age readers recognize the subject, fashions, or material on the cover? If not, then the books need weeding. He also cites the ‘what-if’ factor of weeding. The feeling of what-if that a lot of librarians face in the worry a book or series that circulated well once upon a time might do so again. McEwen advocates for pulling these books in favor of a new series that could circulate better or attract new readers.
   
     In a world where physical books have much to compete with, weeding keeps the collection up to date and becoming a Type A weeder allows for it to happen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Data Driven Deselection: Using a Decision Support Tool

Ehret Snyder, C. (2013, Dec 20). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39 , 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2013.866607 Weeding is a time-consuming and sensitive task for librarians. It is necessary to make space for new material, keep information current and updated, and remove items in poor condition. Librarians have to determine what kind of data is necessary to review in order to justify removing an item from the library’s shelves. Tools exist to help librarians gather multiple points of data to make the process more efficient. The librarians at Olin Library, part of Rollins College in Florida, utilized such a tool (Sustainable Collections Services) to help them update their collection and present the findings in this paper. Summary: Librarians are short on time and weeding is one of the most time-consuming tasks they can take on. Criteria is necessary to make...

Review: Weeding Without Worry

This website is done by the American Libraries Magazine and talks on the importance of weeding for libraries. It starts by speaking on different "weeding horror stories" of patrons seeing library staff throwing books into a dumpster and being outraged, or rare books being thrown out accidentally. Instances like this can give weeding a bad name, and make it harder for both library staff to weed, and patrons to accept the weeding of materials. The website goes on to explain how to avoid these pitfalls, such as making sure to communicate clearly with library patrons about weeding, and exactly what it is, and why it is needed in libraries, and how it helps the library continue to run well and continue serving the community well. One example they give is from the Milwaukee School of Engineering, where they have a page on their website dedicated to weeding, explaining why it is needed, and encouraging patrons to email or speak to a library staff member in person if they have co...

Website Review - Awful Library Books

Awful Library Books The first thing that catches my attention when I navigate to Awful Library Books is the wonderfully out of date and kitschy covers. (Fran gets me ) It’s 246 pages (as of October 5th) of proof of why libraries need to weed. Many of the items are outside submissions and the whole project is curated by Michigan public librarians Mary Kelly and Holly Hibner. This site is… so much fun. Again, people from all over the country submit images of their books in need of deselection. Some of the titles, such as a copy of Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl will require repurchase at the discretion of the branch, and others, such as Easy DOS It! , a book about the no longer relevant DOS computer system, or a tacky as all get out Burt Reynolds book (likely not how he wants to be remembered, RIP), (This?) (Or THIS?) are best never to be seen again. Awful Library Books pokes fun at the idea that libraries are outdated by displaying the items that we get rid of...