Skip to main content

Annotated Bibliography: Reference Collections and Staff: Retaining Relevance


Rix, W. (2009). Reference Collections and Staff: Retaining Relevance. Reference Librarian, 50(3), 302–305. https://doi-org.proxy-clarion.klnpa.org/10.1080/02763870902947109

Wright Rix, a Reference Librarian for Santa Monica Public Library, describes the advantages and reasoning for downsizing a print Reference collection. As information is sought online more and more changing a library’s focus to digitized media not only helps to provide quick online answers for patrons, a reduction in the print collection allows for expansion from other more popular sections such as audio visual and other print selections.

Summary

Rix provides an overview of what reducing a print collection means. Over time patrons are more likely to seek information online and are less likely to seek information in the reference area or even spend much time sitting down for research. By selecting electronic resources and digitizing historical records and other such material the floor space in the library allows for expansion in areas. Rix gives examples of projects that some libraries are undertaking in digitizing photographs, oral histories, and even local newspapers. These projects allow for reducing what is kept on hand in the library and allows the time and staff needs to be used in other pursuits.  

Although brief the information in the article is helpful, especially if a librarian is hesitant to reduce their print reference material. Rix describes a drastic 30% reduction in reference material while daunting was necessary. Rix also suggests that while reducing print material is needed information is not lost only changed form. This article proves good information and options for weeding a refence collection with many positive changes it can have on a library and community.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Data Driven Deselection: Using a Decision Support Tool

Ehret Snyder, C. (2013, Dec 20). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39 , 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2013.866607 Weeding is a time-consuming and sensitive task for librarians. It is necessary to make space for new material, keep information current and updated, and remove items in poor condition. Librarians have to determine what kind of data is necessary to review in order to justify removing an item from the library’s shelves. Tools exist to help librarians gather multiple points of data to make the process more efficient. The librarians at Olin Library, part of Rollins College in Florida, utilized such a tool (Sustainable Collections Services) to help them update their collection and present the findings in this paper. Summary: Librarians are short on time and weeding is one of the most time-consuming tasks they can take on. Criteria is necessary to make...

Annotated Bibliography- Weeding E-Books

Waugh, M., Donlin, M., & Braunstein, S. (2015, Jan 14). Next-generation collection management: a case study of quality control and weeding e-books in an academic library. Collection Management, 40 (1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.965864 This paper presents a case study in e-book weeding from Louisiana State University. E-book collection management policies do not exist in over 95% of ARL (Association of Research Libraries) facilities and it is unlikely numbers would be much lower in any library. E-book collections need to be evaluated according to a thoughtfully created policy in order to keep an up to date, useful collection to serve patrons needs. By examining the difficulties and triumphs experienced by other libraries, staff can work to address deficiencies in their facilities.   A major problem will be interacting with vendors since they control collections. It will be important for individual libraries demand better self-service, s...

Annotated Bibliography - Weeding With ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic Library

O’Neill, J. L. (2016). Weeding with ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic          Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(2), 108-115. doi:10.31229/osf.io/hym8b California State University Fullerton has been open since 1957. Up until 2014, there had not been a large-scale weeding completed of the materials in Pollak Library. Instructional Design Librarian J. Lindsay O’Neill turned to the design process known as ADDIE to develop a method to train librarians to undergo the task. Summary           Weeding is often a difficult task to perform. Not only is it done less often than most tasks library staff perform, it often comes with the guilt of removing material, the fear of making the wrong call, and the concern from stakeholders about ‘throwing books away.’ Making the task even more difficult is the lack of formal training for librarians on weeding in the field....