Skip to main content

Interviews- New England Libraries: Sally


New England Libraries

Interview questions for weeding: Interview with Sally

1. Who is responsible for weeding the collection and how is the collection divided?
Adult collection, Non-Fiction and Reference – Head of Reference and Technical Services
Adult collection, Fiction and Audio Visual – Assistant Director/Head of Circulation
YA collection – Assistant Director/Head of Circulation
Children’s collection – Assistant Director/Head of Circulation

Follow up: Is there anyone who assists in bring books to your attention for consideration?
The collection is divided to assign staff to bring to items their supervisor’s attention for consideration.

2. Is there a set schedule for weeding?
One afternoon a week is dedicated to look at material pulled for consideration. This works well and is a continual process. 

3. Do you have a method that you use, like CREW?
No, we do not use a specific method.

4. What is your criteria for weeding?
Material is weeded based on age, condition, shelf space, and circulation. Non-fiction books are evaluated on relevance. Certain titles are checked for availability through Interlibrary before discarding.

5. What do you do with books after they have been weeded?
Typically, books are given to a book reseller, like Big Hearted Books. However, that company went out of business while looking for a new company books are recycled per instructions, i.e. paperbacks and periodicals are placed directly into recycle bins and hardcovers are placed in the bin after the covers are removed.

6. Does your current method work well?  Would you like to implement another format?
This method works well for us as we have a busy library and need a streamline process. 

7. Is there any flexibility in method or schedule?
Yes, as needed if going through a larger weeding project or in non-fiction books on computers would be weeded more often then cookbooks.

8. Do you use any resources when choosing which items to weed like a website or program?
No for choosing books but when considering replacing items we check award winners, core collection, or other relevant topics.

9. How are your periodicals handled for weeding?
Periodicals are limited to eighteen-month holdings because so many titles are available through databases like EBSCO. We previously held them for thirty-months. Old titles are given to patrons, upon request or recycled.

10. Is there anything else not mentioned that you feel I should know?
Reference are weeded with electronic databases in mind. We are replacing less reference material if there are more relevant electronic material available. Other considerations are things like an incomplete series, if we are missing books 4, 7, and 9, the whole series my be discarded.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Data Driven Deselection: Using a Decision Support Tool

Ehret Snyder, C. (2013, Dec 20). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39 , 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2013.866607 Weeding is a time-consuming and sensitive task for librarians. It is necessary to make space for new material, keep information current and updated, and remove items in poor condition. Librarians have to determine what kind of data is necessary to review in order to justify removing an item from the library’s shelves. Tools exist to help librarians gather multiple points of data to make the process more efficient. The librarians at Olin Library, part of Rollins College in Florida, utilized such a tool (Sustainable Collections Services) to help them update their collection and present the findings in this paper. Summary: Librarians are short on time and weeding is one of the most time-consuming tasks they can take on. Criteria is necessary to make...

Annotated Bibliography- Weeding E-Books

Waugh, M., Donlin, M., & Braunstein, S. (2015, Jan 14). Next-generation collection management: a case study of quality control and weeding e-books in an academic library. Collection Management, 40 (1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.965864 This paper presents a case study in e-book weeding from Louisiana State University. E-book collection management policies do not exist in over 95% of ARL (Association of Research Libraries) facilities and it is unlikely numbers would be much lower in any library. E-book collections need to be evaluated according to a thoughtfully created policy in order to keep an up to date, useful collection to serve patrons needs. By examining the difficulties and triumphs experienced by other libraries, staff can work to address deficiencies in their facilities.   A major problem will be interacting with vendors since they control collections. It will be important for individual libraries demand better self-service, s...

Annotated Bibliography - Weeding With ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic Library

O’Neill, J. L. (2016). Weeding with ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic          Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(2), 108-115. doi:10.31229/osf.io/hym8b California State University Fullerton has been open since 1957. Up until 2014, there had not been a large-scale weeding completed of the materials in Pollak Library. Instructional Design Librarian J. Lindsay O’Neill turned to the design process known as ADDIE to develop a method to train librarians to undergo the task. Summary           Weeding is often a difficult task to perform. Not only is it done less often than most tasks library staff perform, it often comes with the guilt of removing material, the fear of making the wrong call, and the concern from stakeholders about ‘throwing books away.’ Making the task even more difficult is the lack of formal training for librarians on weeding in the field....