Skip to main content

Interviews- New England Libraries: Sally

By

New England Libraries

Interview questions for weeding: Interview with Sally

1. Who is responsible for weeding the collection and how is the collection divided?
Adult collection, Non-Fiction and Reference – Head of Reference and Technical Services
Adult collection, Fiction and Audio Visual – Assistant Director/Head of Circulation
YA collection – Assistant Director/Head of Circulation
Children’s collection – Assistant Director/Head of Circulation

Follow up: Is there anyone who assists in bring books to your attention for consideration?
The collection is divided to assign staff to bring to items their supervisor’s attention for consideration.

2. Is there a set schedule for weeding?
One afternoon a week is dedicated to look at material pulled for consideration. This works well and is a continual process. 

3. Do you have a method that you use, like CREW?
No, we do not use a specific method.

4. What is your criteria for weeding?
Material is weeded based on age, condition, shelf space, and circulation. Non-fiction books are evaluated on relevance. Certain titles are checked for availability through Interlibrary before discarding.

5. What do you do with books after they have been weeded?
Typically, books are given to a book reseller, like Big Hearted Books. However, that company went out of business while looking for a new company books are recycled per instructions, i.e. paperbacks and periodicals are placed directly into recycle bins and hardcovers are placed in the bin after the covers are removed.

6. Does your current method work well?  Would you like to implement another format?
This method works well for us as we have a busy library and need a streamline process. 

7. Is there any flexibility in method or schedule?
Yes, as needed if going through a larger weeding project or in non-fiction books on computers would be weeded more often then cookbooks.

8. Do you use any resources when choosing which items to weed like a website or program?
No for choosing books but when considering replacing items we check award winners, core collection, or other relevant topics.

9. How are your periodicals handled for weeding?
Periodicals are limited to eighteen-month holdings because so many titles are available through databases like EBSCO. We previously held them for thirty-months. Old titles are given to patrons, upon request or recycled.

10. Is there anything else not mentioned that you feel I should know?
Reference are weeded with electronic databases in mind. We are replacing less reference material if there are more relevant electronic material available. Other considerations are things like an incomplete series, if we are missing books 4, 7, and 9, the whole series my be discarded.  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Data Driven Deselection: Using a Decision Support Tool

By
Ehret Snyder, C. (2013, Dec 20). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39 , 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2013.866607 Weeding is a time-consuming and sensitive task for librarians. It is necessary to make space for new material, keep information current and updated, and remove items in poor condition. Librarians have to determine what kind of data is necessary to review in order to justify removing an item from the library’s shelves. Tools exist to help librarians gather multiple points of data to make the process more efficient. The librarians at Olin Library, part of Rollins College in Florida, utilized such a tool (Sustainable Collections Services) to help them update their collection and present the findings in this paper. Summary: Librarians are short on time and weeding is one of the most time-consuming tasks they can take on. Criteria is necessary to make...
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: Weeding Without Worry

By
This website is done by the American Libraries Magazine and talks on the importance of weeding for libraries. It starts by speaking on different "weeding horror stories" of patrons seeing library staff throwing books into a dumpster and being outraged, or rare books being thrown out accidentally. Instances like this can give weeding a bad name, and make it harder for both library staff to weed, and patrons to accept the weeding of materials. The website goes on to explain how to avoid these pitfalls, such as making sure to communicate clearly with library patrons about weeding, and exactly what it is, and why it is needed in libraries, and how it helps the library continue to run well and continue serving the community well. One example they give is from the Milwaukee School of Engineering, where they have a page on their website dedicated to weeding, explaining why it is needed, and encouraging patrons to email or speak to a library staff member in person if they have co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Website Review - Awful Library Books

By
Awful Library Books The first thing that catches my attention when I navigate to Awful Library Books is the wonderfully out of date and kitschy covers. (Fran gets me ) It’s 246 pages (as of October 5th) of proof of why libraries need to weed. Many of the items are outside submissions and the whole project is curated by Michigan public librarians Mary Kelly and Holly Hibner. This site is… so much fun. Again, people from all over the country submit images of their books in need of deselection. Some of the titles, such as a copy of Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl will require repurchase at the discretion of the branch, and others, such as Easy DOS It! , a book about the no longer relevant DOS computer system, or a tacky as all get out Burt Reynolds book (likely not how he wants to be remembered, RIP), (This?) (Or THIS?) are best never to be seen again. Awful Library Books pokes fun at the idea that libraries are outdated by displaying the items that we get rid of...
Post a Comment
Read more