Skip to main content

Website Review- Arizona State Library

By

Arizona State Library


The Arizona State Library is a no-frill, but thorough site that breaks weeding down to clear and manageable parts by walking the reader through the necessary steps of a useful weeding project. The site begins with an overview of the importance and necessity of weeding in plain language while offering links to resources that will offer a more in-depth conversation.

ASL then delves into helping librarians plan a practical approach using the CREW method; or Continuous Review, Evaluation and Weeding. One of the best parts of this site is the explanations given to reason why this information is used or presented as helpful. They explain that the CREW method is based on the research of Stanley Slote and details how it has helped other libraries improve their collection. By understanding how and why this method is helpful, librarians will be better able to relate it to their own collections.

Next, the site offers up a plan to “get down to business”.  A basic book flag outline is offered with additional suggestions. Criteria is defined with MUSTIE, or the CREW method’s acronym to help librarians identify material to be removed. For example, the M is for misleading or factually inaccurate items. In addition to defining the MUSTIE items, the ASL also offers up additional criteria to consider including condition and the availability of the work elsewhere. ASL offers a breakdown of things to consider by Dewey numbers, adult fiction, children’s fiction, reference, and so on.

Finally, ASL offers up suggestions on how to wrap up with mending suggestions or a variety of ways to rid the library of the item entirely. They also provide a few resources for more information in addition to the links that are added throughout the article.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Data Driven Deselection: Using a Decision Support Tool

By
Ehret Snyder, C. (2013, Dec 20). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39 , 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2013.866607 Weeding is a time-consuming and sensitive task for librarians. It is necessary to make space for new material, keep information current and updated, and remove items in poor condition. Librarians have to determine what kind of data is necessary to review in order to justify removing an item from the library’s shelves. Tools exist to help librarians gather multiple points of data to make the process more efficient. The librarians at Olin Library, part of Rollins College in Florida, utilized such a tool (Sustainable Collections Services) to help them update their collection and present the findings in this paper. Summary: Librarians are short on time and weeding is one of the most time-consuming tasks they can take on. Criteria is necessary to make...
Post a Comment
Read more

Annotated Bibliography- Weeding E-Books

By
Waugh, M., Donlin, M., & Braunstein, S. (2015, Jan 14). Next-generation collection management: a case study of quality control and weeding e-books in an academic library. Collection Management, 40 (1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.965864 This paper presents a case study in e-book weeding from Louisiana State University. E-book collection management policies do not exist in over 95% of ARL (Association of Research Libraries) facilities and it is unlikely numbers would be much lower in any library. E-book collections need to be evaluated according to a thoughtfully created policy in order to keep an up to date, useful collection to serve patrons needs. By examining the difficulties and triumphs experienced by other libraries, staff can work to address deficiencies in their facilities.   A major problem will be interacting with vendors since they control collections. It will be important for individual libraries demand better self-service, s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Annotated Bibliography - Weeding With ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic Library

By
O’Neill, J. L. (2016). Weeding with ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic          Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(2), 108-115. doi:10.31229/osf.io/hym8b California State University Fullerton has been open since 1957. Up until 2014, there had not been a large-scale weeding completed of the materials in Pollak Library. Instructional Design Librarian J. Lindsay O’Neill turned to the design process known as ADDIE to develop a method to train librarians to undergo the task. Summary           Weeding is often a difficult task to perform. Not only is it done less often than most tasks library staff perform, it often comes with the guilt of removing material, the fear of making the wrong call, and the concern from stakeholders about ‘throwing books away.’ Making the task even more difficult is the lack of formal training for librarians on weeding in the field....
Post a Comment
Read more