Skip to main content

Website Review- Idaho Libraries



The Idaho Libraries site offers similar information as the Arizona State Library site, but specifically notes that it is directed for librarians that do not have formal training. It’s a good concept and important to remember that not everyone comes into library work with the same background, education, or skill set. It’s also helpful as it’s set up as an online course with “exams” one has to pass to move forward, but sections can be accessed individually from the home page with no problem.

IL begins with an overview about why weeding is important and why it is controversial: it makes it easier to use, helps staff know the collection better, gets rid of outdated and damaged material, and find strengths and weaknesses in the collection. Next is criteria with a reference to the CREW method and MUSTIE criteria. Step three is the actual process for weeding. Readers are encouraged to follow a plan, are given an example of a disposal slip, and encouraged to consider performing a general inventory at the same time.

Part 4 reviews common problems encountered in weeding along with solutions. These range from dealing with objections from a library board to finding time to complete the weeding. Finally, IL helps users find ways to dispose the weeded materials. Options include first trying to repair, then moving on to donating to larger libraries or book sales. Recycling versus trashing is also discussed. If materials are disposed of, understanding how to finesse public relations will be important and that is discussed in detail.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Data Driven Deselection: Using a Decision Support Tool

Ehret Snyder, C. (2013, Dec 20). Data-driven deselection: multiple point data using a decision support tool in an academic library. Collection Management, 39 , 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2013.866607 Weeding is a time-consuming and sensitive task for librarians. It is necessary to make space for new material, keep information current and updated, and remove items in poor condition. Librarians have to determine what kind of data is necessary to review in order to justify removing an item from the library’s shelves. Tools exist to help librarians gather multiple points of data to make the process more efficient. The librarians at Olin Library, part of Rollins College in Florida, utilized such a tool (Sustainable Collections Services) to help them update their collection and present the findings in this paper. Summary: Librarians are short on time and weeding is one of the most time-consuming tasks they can take on. Criteria is necessary to make...

Review: Weeding Without Worry

This website is done by the American Libraries Magazine and talks on the importance of weeding for libraries. It starts by speaking on different "weeding horror stories" of patrons seeing library staff throwing books into a dumpster and being outraged, or rare books being thrown out accidentally. Instances like this can give weeding a bad name, and make it harder for both library staff to weed, and patrons to accept the weeding of materials. The website goes on to explain how to avoid these pitfalls, such as making sure to communicate clearly with library patrons about weeding, and exactly what it is, and why it is needed in libraries, and how it helps the library continue to run well and continue serving the community well. One example they give is from the Milwaukee School of Engineering, where they have a page on their website dedicated to weeding, explaining why it is needed, and encouraging patrons to email or speak to a library staff member in person if they have co...

Website Review - Awful Library Books

Awful Library Books The first thing that catches my attention when I navigate to Awful Library Books is the wonderfully out of date and kitschy covers. (Fran gets me ) It’s 246 pages (as of October 5th) of proof of why libraries need to weed. Many of the items are outside submissions and the whole project is curated by Michigan public librarians Mary Kelly and Holly Hibner. This site is… so much fun. Again, people from all over the country submit images of their books in need of deselection. Some of the titles, such as a copy of Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl will require repurchase at the discretion of the branch, and others, such as Easy DOS It! , a book about the no longer relevant DOS computer system, or a tacky as all get out Burt Reynolds book (likely not how he wants to be remembered, RIP), (This?) (Or THIS?) are best never to be seen again. Awful Library Books pokes fun at the idea that libraries are outdated by displaying the items that we get rid of...