Skip to main content

Interview: New England Libraries: Sylvie


New England Libraries

Interview questions for weeding: Interview with Sylvie

1. Who is responsible for weeding the collection and how is the collection divided?
 Adult collection – Adult Services/reference librarian
YA collection – YA Librarian
Children’s collection – Children’s librarian
Video games – YA Librarian
These are the major divisions. There are a few smaller collections that certain staff members who have an interest or expertise in that help the development and weeding.

Follow up: Is there anyone who assists in bring books to your attention for consideration?
Anyone on staff can recommend a book or item for weeding based on condition, content or other reasons.

2. Is there a set schedule for weeding?
We have just developed a weeding schedule and have started implementation. The entire collection is covered over a 12-month period.

3. Do you have a method that you use, like CREW?
We have adapted CREW to our collection. So, this is loosely the method we use.

4. What is your criteria for weeding?
In general:
Non-fiction that has not circulated in 5 years. We also review content to be sure it is up to date (ie: legal, medical, travelogues etc)
Fiction that has not circulated in 3 years.
Exceptions are made for local interest titles, local authors and special collections.

5. What do you do with books after they have been weeded?
We just finished a very large weeding project. In this case it is impossible to re-home all books. The majority were recycled. The Children’s picture books and easy readers were donated to a new Charter School that opened this fall. Some specialty titles we found homes for. Going forward we hope to work with a book consigner, but anticipate the many books will be recycled.  Our duplicates of bestsellers are donated to our Friends group for their book sale after circulation numbers drop.

6. Does your current method work well?  Would you like to implement another format?
This is an ongoing work in process and we are always looking for ways to improve. Also depending on our building’s needs we may have to adapt. ( ie: restructuring of floor space, need to make room for a new collection etc.)

7. Is there any flexibility in method or schedule?
We are trying to stick to the schedule that has been setup, but the method is very flexible dependent upon the library’s current needs.

8. Do you use any resources when choosing which items to weed like a website or program?
We may double check lists of award winners etc.

9. How are your periodicals handled for weeding?
We keep about 24 issues at a time for all periodicals and newspapers with the exception of our local town paper. We archive back issues of these.

10. Is there anything else not mentioned that you feel I should know?
In the last year and a half we have radically reduced our reference collection, so the methods and criteria did not apply to that project. In that case, we evaluated whether or not we had access to the information in our databases or on line. Some of the resources were relocated into our non-fiction collection, much of the specialized resources were offered to other institutions. (ex: a music encyclopedia collection went to our local high school’s music department; an art history reference collection went to Teti etc.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annotated Bibliography- Weeding E-Books

Waugh, M., Donlin, M., & Braunstein, S. (2015, Jan 14). Next-generation collection management: a case study of quality control and weeding e-books in an academic library. Collection Management, 40 (1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.965864 This paper presents a case study in e-book weeding from Louisiana State University. E-book collection management policies do not exist in over 95% of ARL (Association of Research Libraries) facilities and it is unlikely numbers would be much lower in any library. E-book collections need to be evaluated according to a thoughtfully created policy in order to keep an up to date, useful collection to serve patrons needs. By examining the difficulties and triumphs experienced by other libraries, staff can work to address deficiencies in their facilities.   A major problem will be interacting with vendors since they control collections. It will be important for individual libraries demand better self-service, s...

Annotated Bibliography - Weeding With ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic Library

O’Neill, J. L. (2016). Weeding with ADDIE: Developing Training for Deselection at an Academic          Library. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 56(2), 108-115. doi:10.31229/osf.io/hym8b California State University Fullerton has been open since 1957. Up until 2014, there had not been a large-scale weeding completed of the materials in Pollak Library. Instructional Design Librarian J. Lindsay O’Neill turned to the design process known as ADDIE to develop a method to train librarians to undergo the task. Summary           Weeding is often a difficult task to perform. Not only is it done less often than most tasks library staff perform, it often comes with the guilt of removing material, the fear of making the wrong call, and the concern from stakeholders about ‘throwing books away.’ Making the task even more difficult is the lack of formal training for librarians on weeding in the field....